Article  |   July 2009
2008 Zemlin Award in Speech Sciences Memorial Lecture: The Role of Auditory Feedback for the Control of Voice Fundamental Frequency and Amplitude
Author Affiliations
  • Charles R. Larson
    Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Speech, Voice & Prosody
Article   |   July 2009
2008 Zemlin Award in Speech Sciences Memorial Lecture: The Role of Auditory Feedback for the Control of Voice Fundamental Frequency and Amplitude
SIG 5 Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorders July 2009, Vol.19, 6-17. doi:10.1044/ssod19.1.6
SIG 5 Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorders July 2009, Vol.19, 6-17. doi:10.1044/ssod19.1.6
Abstract:

Abstract  Previous research has failed to identify precise neural mechanisms involved in auditory feedback regulation of vocalization. The goal of this research project was to improve our understanding of neural mechanisms controlling the voice. Participants were instructed to sustain a vowel or repeat phrases during which perturbations in voice pitch or loudness feedback were presented. Voice signal averaging, neuroimaging, laryngeal electromyography, and cortical event-related potential techniques were used to measure vocal and neural responses to perturbed feedback. Pitch- and loudness-shifted voice feedback triggers small automatic corrective responses in voice fundamental frequency and amplitude during vowel or speech production. Larger responses during speech suggest task modulation of these responses. Larger responses were also recorded in individuals with Parkinson’s disease and children with autism than in normal controls. Neural recording techniques revealed cortical activation during these responses. Cortical mechanisms are involved in generating corrective vocal responses to perturbations in voice auditory feedback. This system helps control the voice during speech and dynamically adjusts responses to meet vocal goals. Abnormally large responses in individuals with Parkinson’s disease and autism suggest that the audio-vocal mechanisms just described may be involved in the speech and vocalizations of these individuals as well.

Become a SIG Affiliate
Pay Per View
Entire SIG 5 Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorders content & archive
24-hour access
This Issue
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Editor’s Column
SIG 5 Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorders July 2009, Vol.19, 4-5. doi:10.1044/ssod19.1.4
Development and Testing of a Portable Vocal Accumulator
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2003, Vol.46, 1457-1467. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/113)
Effects of Masking Noise on Laryngeal Resistance for Breathy, Normal, and Pressed Voice
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2010, Vol.53, 850-861. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0069)
SIGs Welcome New Coordinating Committee Members
The ASHA Leader October 2013, Vol.18, 62. doi:10.1044/leader.AN14.18102013.62
The Relationship Between Perception of Vocal Effort and Relative Fundamental Frequency During Voicing Offset and Onset
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2012, Vol.55, 1887-1896. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0294)